Skip to content

Daniel Jackson

Principal Associate

Connect with Daniel Jackson:

Daniel is a Principal Associate in our Financial Services Dispute and Investigations group and on our Pensions Disputes team.

Daniel is experienced in complex banking litigation, professional negligence/mis-selling claims (including pensions investments), outsourcing disputes, and has a particular focus and experience in handling financial mis-selling and consumer credit/finance claims.

Daniel also regularly advises financial institution clients regarding regulatory and compliance issues, including regulatory investigations, past business reviews and consumer redress schemes; as well as complaints handling strategies for dealing with the FOS and the FCA. Daniel’s article on complaints handling was published as a Practice Note on PLC.

As a member of our Pensions Disputes team, Daniel is been heavily involved in the firm's offering in the SIPP sector with a particular focus on defending widespread mis-selling/professional negligence claims against SIPP providers. He led a portfolio of complaints under DISP, FOS complaints and legal claims for a SIPP provider with an exposure in excess of £50 million. Daniel also has significant experience in pensions transfers and scams complaints and claims.

Daniel was the lead fee earner in Russell Adams -v- Options UK Personal Pensions LLP (acting for Options), in which the Court of Appeal provided the leading judgment on the extent of duties owed by an execution-only SIPP administrator, the application of COBS to SIPP administrators, and the application of s.27 FSMA which was previously untested by the courts. The case is subject to an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Daniel has significant experience in dealing with consumer credit/finance claims. Daniel has particular experience in s.75 claims, in respect of which he trains a number of KAM clients on an annual basis.

Recent client experience includes:

  • advising a major global bank in respect of a c.£150m raising various allegations, including a derivative claim to be brought on behalf of a PLC company and allegations under the unfair relationship provisions of the CCA 1974
  • advising a crypto-provider regarding a c.$45m claim brought by three individuals. The claim raises well over a dozen allegations ranging from breach of contract, through to intimidation claims, breaches of data protection legislation, and regulatory issues, amongst many others. The claim concerns multiple jurisdictions.

Daniel’s article on complaints handling was published as a Practice Note on PLC.

Daniel Jackson

Principal Associate

Daniel Jackson

Principal Associate

Email