Global menu

Our global pages


Creating growth through M&A is being stifled by a lack of joined up thinking in M&A processes - Eversheds Lina & Guia

  • Romania


    • New global study by Eversheds reveals that deal due diligence does not focus enough on post deal integration
    • Little or no focus beyond the deal transaction to post-integration is compromising the benefits and value of cross-border M&A
    • Internal processes are as much to blame as external factors

    Global businesses are not realizing the full potential of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as a means of driving growth due to weaknesses in the deal process. A new global study, The M&A Blueprint: Inception to Integration, published today by global law firm Eversheds, shows that deal teams need a more holistic approach and stronger connections between the planning, completion and post-deal integration phases.

    The study involved more than 400 multi-national businesses* who have worked on cross-border M&A deals in the past three years. It shows that nearly half (43%) of businesses believe that the most common cause for deals not successfully achieving their goals is due to a failure to address post deal integration from the early stages of deal due diligence.

    The report also shows that legal risk is an increasingly important consideration in the assessment of potential deals. General Counsel provide essential input at this stage and more than half (59%) of all respondents said they had spotted potentially damaging issues early enough to caution management about proceeding with the deal.

    The research highlights that less experienced buyers are finding the process challenging but even those with a wealth of knowledge believe that there are improvements to be made.

    Mihai Guia, Managing Partner at Eversheds Lina & Guia, said:

    "Essentially, this report came to confirm what our lawyers already noticed during the numerous M&A cross-border transactions in which we were involved. Very often the expertize of Eversheds Lina & Guia was requested in an advance state of the transactions and, unfortunately for our clients, the setbacks caused by the lack of due diligence were either very difficult to amend, or could not be overcome at all, thus causing a prejudice not anticipated during the initial analysis phase of the transaction.

    We customary recommend to all our clients to have a holistic approach regarding M&A deals and underline the fact that cutting back on certain initial expenses related to due diligence may lead to failure of potentially very successful transactions."

    The M&A Blueprint: Inception to Integration report sets out the blueprint for success in cross-border deals as identified by deal-makers themselves:

    1. Inception

    • From the start - 38% of deals where the in-house team were brought in too late suffered problems during integration.
    • Early warning - 59% of all respondents said they had spotted potentially damaging issues early enough to advise that a deal should not go ahead.

    2. Planning and due diligence.

    • The crucial stage - 43% said the most common cause of the failure to realise value in transactions was down to avoidable errors in the due diligence and planning phase.
    • Joined up thinking - 70% felt that linking due diligence and integration planning together would help to improve the deal process.

    3. Deal execution

    • What matters most - The reasons General Counsel would advise not to proceed with a deal were illegality/regulatory (45%), e.g. bribery, competition and antitrust, and commercial concerns (45%), e.g. price and valuation, litigation risk, integration costs.

    4. Integration

    • A false saving? - 83% did not use external lawyers to a large degree during integration, although they were acknowledged to add value. The main reason for this was cost.
    • Avoid mismatches - 26% felt that the failure to realize value in a recent cross-border M&A deal was due to a misalignment between legal dealmakers and the day to day business team.

    The report also found that companies are two and half times more likely to have faced problems with integration if the in-house legal teams were involved late in the process. This is particularly true for those who are less experienced in the deal process, with the report showing that businesses whose in-house legal teams had worked on less than ten cross-border deals over the past two years were more likely to face problems in the integration phase.

    Additionally, the report reveals that legal advice, both internal and external, is currently brought in too late and not at a strategic level. Appropriate proper legal advice at every stage in the deal cycle is critical to the success of M&A transactions.

    The full report can be requested by sending us an e-mail at

    This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.

    < Go back