Transparency in the value chain: Implications of the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) represents a pivotal effort in tackling some of today’s most urgent global issues. As the effects of global warming escalate—through more frequent extreme weather events, deforestation and intensive farming practices—the urgency for responsible corporate behavior grows significantly.

These environmental crises threaten not only natural habitats but also have profound impacts on local communities, leading to displacement, loss of livelihoods, health crises and large-scale migration. In an era where sustainability and ethical standards are becoming increasingly crucial, the CSDDD stands out as a key legislative milestone within the broader EU Green Deal framework. It enhances value chain transparency while mandating rigorous human rights and environmental due diligence.

Understanding the CSDDD

The CSDDD applies to both EU-based and non-EU companies that meet specified criteria. For EU companies, this includes large companies and partnerships with over 1,000 employees and worldwide net turnover exceeding EUR 450 million. Non-EU companies fall under its scope if they generate more than EUR 450 million in net turnover within the EU. While many smaller companies are not directly affected, they must still evaluate and report on their operations and those within their supply chains linked to entities directly covered by the directive.

Effective from July 25, 2024, the directive will be phased in, with EU Member States given two years to transpose CSDDD into national law, leading to full implementation by the end of 2026 and reporting starting in 2027. The CSDDD mandates businesses to identify, prevent, mitigate, and disclose adverse human rights and environmental impacts arising from their operations and supply chains. For companies using AI, this means they need to ensure that their AI systems do not contribute to such adverse impacts, including third-party AI solutions.

Key components of the CSDDD

Due Diligence Obligations: Companies must conduct comprehensive due diligence to pinpoint potential risks in their supply chains, including evaluating environmental and human rights impacts of their operations and those of their suppliers.

Reporting and Transparency: Businesses must publicly report their due diligence activities, ensuring stakeholders can see their commitment to upholding sustainability standards.

Preventive Measures: Upon identifying risks, companies are required to enact measures to prevent, mitigate and eliminate these adverse impacts. This might involve altering business practices, collaborating with suppliers to elevate their standards or severing ties with non-compliant partners.

Remediation: When negative impacts occur, companies are obligated to undertake effective measures.

CSDDD also requires companies to draft and implement a climate transition plan that must ensure that the company’s business model and strategy are compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C, in line with the Paris Agreement.

Improving Value Chain Openness

Through comprehensive reporting and disclosure requirements, the CSDDD aims to shed light on often-hidden practices within global supply chains. This increased openness serves several purposes:

Accountability: Companies are held accountable for their own actions and those of their suppliers, reducing the risk of unethical behaviors going unnoticed.

Consumer Trust: Transparency fosters consumer trust. As consumers become more conscious of the ethical aspects of their purchases, they are more likely to support companies that are dedicated to sustainability.

Investor Confidence: Investors are increasingly factoring in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations. Transparent reporting equips them with essential information for making informed decisions.

Impact on Supply Chain Diligence

The CSDDD raises the bar for supply chain due diligence, requiring companies to adopt proactive management strategies, which include:

Risk Assessment: Conducting regular and thorough risk evaluations to identify potential human rights and environmental issues.

Supplier Engagement: Actively engaging with suppliers to ensure compliance with required standards, potentially involving training, capacity-building and frequent audits.

Continuous Improvement: Establishing mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and enhancement of supply chain practices.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with the CSDDD can lead to serious consequences for companies, such as:

Legal Penalties: Companies may face substantial fines and legal actions, with penalties designed to serve as strong deterrents against non-compliance. Aside from financial penalties, this may also exclude companies from being eligible to participate in public tenders.

Investor Withdrawal: As investors increasingly prioritize ESG factors, non-compliance can lead to divestment and diminished investor confidence, jeopardizing a company’s financial stability.

Reputational Damage: In today’s digital era, news of non-compliance can spread quickly, causing significant reputational harm. This can result in lost consumer trust, reduced sales and a damaged brand image.

Operational Disruptions: Non-compliance may necessitate severing ties with non-compliant suppliers, leading to delays, higher costs and operational inefficiencies.

The CSDDD marks a significant step forward in promoting value chain transparency and enhancing supply chain diligence. Through stringent due diligence, preventive actions, and transparent reporting, the directive fosters accountability and sustainability within global supply chains. Companies adhering to these standards stand to gain increased consumer trust, investor confidence and operational resilience, whereas non-compliance could result in severe legal, reputational and financial repercussions.

Discover how your business can navigate the AI legal landscape and innovate responsibly. Read our latest AI and ESG Telescope edition here:

The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer. Eversheds Sutherland is a provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information about these entities and Eversheds Sutherlands' structure please see the Legal Notice page of this website.